Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But you are still attacking the person, rather than his argument.


Okay, then, Zed's argument fits the pattern of something formulated by someone outside of their area of expertise.

Zed has exhibited difficulty with the precise use of terminology before. In the recent talk that was posted, you hear him saying for people not to come up and correct him on his use of terms like "Turing Complete."

http://blog.cusec.net/2009/01/05/zed-shaw-the-acl-is-dead-cu...

There are other terms that he unintentionally abuses in the talk. (left as exercise) Still, I think it's a great talk and agree with a lot of what he says. He reminds me of a coworker of mine. This coworker is hazy on things like the laws of Thermodynamics and some aspects of Object Oriented Programming, but he seems to get things done, and I'd have to say he's a good programmer.


I shudder to think what Zed's code is like. Did I say rm? I meant cp...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: