Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Only corporate legal could freak out over the idea of hiding a single stanza of an 80 year old poem across a dozen resource names where they'll never ever be seen by the average user. If that's not fair use it should be.


You don't want to end up with a court trying to figure out whether that usage constitutes fair use. Taking a stand on whether it "should be" fair use isn't what company resources are for.


An accurate representation of corporate legal's general attitude, yeah... just say no to any request because that covers your ass.


Legal troubles are exactly why you have a legal team. Uber didn't ask for permission, neither did OpenAI. Now they're worth billions. Microsoft and Apple do their own fairshare of probably borderline illegal things too.


Selection bias. Lots of other companies did borderline illegal or fully illegal things and they are gone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_corporate_collapses_an... (although many of these are incompetence collapses).


Yes but they did illegal things that materially increased the value of the company, they didn't send employees off to mug people in alleys just for the fun of it.


Neither is stopping the presses for every little thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: