Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think gemma-4-26b-a4b and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B show that there's something very interesting about a local model that does mixture-of-experts (which helps a lot with performance) and has in the order of 30 billion parameters.

These models are very capable, and use around 20-30GB of RAM while they are running.

Provided you have 64GB of RAM that leaves space for running other applications at the same time.

 help



Obtaining that 64GB RAM is a meaningful obstacle for many.

I'm still amazed that you can run LLMs of this quality on a machine that costs less than $3,000.

I used to assume that anything GPT-4 equivalent or higher would need $30,000+ of server-class hardware.

That said... gemma-4-12b-qat is 7.15GB on disk so should run reasonably well in 16GB, that takes it down to MacBook Air territory https://lmstudio.ai/models/google/gemma-4-12b-qat


Second this notion. After picking up an OEM Spark and running qwen36moe/dense, I was thoroughly impressed with what such small models can do and the (reasonable) speeds you can get. I'm back to using open weight models via an API (wanted more capability for the time being), but will be getting more hardware soon (re: ds4-flash and the fable shot heard round the world)

Not just RAM, VRAM, right? Though they're one and the same on the Mac.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: