My guess is that the downvotes are because the comment was mostly content-free, expressing only a tangential opinion, with a mildly derogatory tone. That you agree with the opinion doesn't make it a good comment in the general sense.
I'm sorry that it came off that way. I was trying to point out the fact that there is a fundamental problem with twitter's model which this article completely fails to address: the tension between Twitter the company and its need to make money, and Twitter the communication service which needs to facilitate connection between human beings.
